Fantasy, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere: Male Bodies of Dis/Inhibition
Abstract
Nominated for the 2022 Gradiva® Award! This book presents the first in-depth study of online misogyny and the manosphere from a psychoanalytic perspective. The author argues that the men of the manosphere present contradictory thoughts, desires and fantasies about women which include but also go beyond misogyny. They are in a state of dis/inhibition: torn between (un)conscious forces and fantasies which erupt and are defended against. Dis/inhibition shows itself in self-victimization and defensive apathy as well as toxic agency and symbolic power and expresses itself in desire for and hatred of other bodies. The text draws on the psychoanalytic thinkers Klaus Theweleit, Elisabeth Young-Bruehl, Jessica Benjamin and Wilhelm Reich to present detailed analyses of the communities within the so-called manosphere, including incels, Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), alt-right YouTubers and NoFap users. Drawing on wider discussions about the status of sexuality in contemporary neoliberal technoculture since the sexual revolution of the late 1960s, it illuminates how sexuality, racism and images of the white male body shape the fantasies and affects of many men on the internet and beyond. Integrating a unique theoretical framework to help understand how today’s increase in online misogyny relates to the alt-right and fascism, Online Misogyny and the Manosphere is an important resource for academics in a variety of fields including psychoanalysis, media and communication studies, interne…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Manosphere ideologies construct women as responsible for their own objectification while portraying men as victims of wrongful rejection.
“This kind of slut-shaming many ideologies found in the manosphere that construct women as responsible for their own objectification while portraying men as victims of (wrongful) rejection (Johanssen 2021).”
From Technology-facilitated sexual violence perpetration as a tool for gender policing in secondary schools (2026) · cites this paper as Johanssen 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok
Solea, A. I., & Sugiura, L. (2023) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-023-09559-5 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Capelos, T., Salmela, M., Talalakina, A., & Cotena, O. (2024) · Philosophies · doi:10.3390/philosophies9020036 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Almanssori, S., Paskaran, L., & Mendes, K. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2025.2531789 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Johanssen, J.
- Corresponding author
- Johanssen, Jacob
- ORCID
- Johanssen, Jacob
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2021-09-02
- OpenAlex
- W4210464930
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 12.99
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Psychoanalysis and Social Critique
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- online misogyny, manosphere, psychoanalytic theory, incels, alt-right, toxic masculinity, racism, symbolic power, self-victimization, Klaus Theweleit, Jessica Benjamin, Wilhelm Reich, fascism, online communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review