The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intercultural contact, hybridity, and third space
Abstract
Employing a discourse approach to intercultural communication, this chapter explores the ‘traffic in meaning’ (Pratt 2002 ) that occurs when people from different cultures enter into contact with one another. In their discussion, the authors draw on work in anthropology, applied linguistics, and cultural theory. Problematising traditional notions of identity, they argue that, by conceptualising one’s identity only as attributable to one’s linguistic, cultural, ethnic, national, or social background, one runs the risk of essentialising such characteristics and making them into stable, non-negotiable features of the Self. Citing examples of intercultural contact in diverse contexts, the authors draw attention to the opportunities and dangers of hybridity and ‘third spaces’, including those that have recently opened up online. Advocating ‘truly ecological or poststructuralist methods of inquiry’, they argue that the study of intercultural contact should address issues of power and ideology, historicity, and subjectivity, within a poststructuralist framework.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In this example, the curricular focus is not coordinating voices, a pluri-versal dialogue.
“In this example, the curricular focus is not coordinating voices, a pluri-versal dialogue (Kramsch & Uryu, 2020).”
From Creating third spaces in K-12 socio-environmental education through indigenous languages: a case study (2024) · cites this paper as Kramsch & Uryu, 2020
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Grosjean, F. (2010) Bilingualism: Life and Reality, Cambridge: Harvard UP. (A realistic treatment of what it means to grow up bilingual.) · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Audley, S., & D’Souza, A. B. (2024) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2038833 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramsch, C., & Uryu, M.
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Language and Intercultural Communication
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2020-04-29
- Pages
- 204-218
- OpenAlex
- W4253339891
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 33.04
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural, Media, and Literary Studies
- Keywords
- intercultural contact, hybridity, third space, identity, essentialism, poststructuralism, power and ideology, discourse analysis, subjectivity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review