The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Case Against Perfection
Abstract
Like cosmetic surgery, genetic enhancement employs medical means for nonmedical ends–ends unrelated to curing or preventing disease or repairing injury. But unlike cosmetic surgery, genetic enhancement is more than skin-deep. In order to grapple with the ethics of enhancement, one need to confront questions largely lost from view–questions about the moral status of nature, and about the proper stance of human beings toward the given world. Human memory is more complicated, but biotech companies, including Memory Pharmaceuticals, are in hot pursuit of memory-enhancing drugs, or “cognition enhancers,” for human beings. The obvious market for such drugs consists of those who suffer from Alzheimer’s and other serious memory disorders. Pediatricians already struggle with the ethics of enhancement when confronted by parents who want to make their children taller. Since the 1980s human growth hormone has been approved for children with a hormone deficiency that makes them much shorter than average.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Philosophy of Transhumanism
More, M. (2013) · The Transhumanist Reader · doi:10.1002/9781118555927.ch1 · Cited by 441
The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics
Bostrom, N., & Ord, T. (2006) · Ethics · doi:10.1086/505233 · Cited by 265
Araki, M., & Ishii, T. (2014) · Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/1477-7827-12-108 · Cited by 150
Pharmacological cognitive enhancement and cheapened achievement: A new dilemma.
Gordon, E. C., & Dunn, L. (2021) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-021-09477-5 · Cited by 6
Metadata
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Case Against Perfection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003075004-28
- The paper
- Sandel, M. J. (2020). The Case Against Perfection. The Ethics of Sports Technologies and Human Enhancement. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075004-28
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
