EMI Teachers’ Use of Interactive Metadiscourse in Lecture Organisation and Knowledge Construction
Abstract
Effective knowledge transmission has been a key issue surrounding EMI. In EMI settings, learning a difficult subject through the medium of the students’ less proficient language may complicate the already challenging task of processing the content as listening to lengthy and information-dense lectures can be mentally challenging for listeners. In academic lectures, listeners need to understand the hierarchic and semantic relationships behind that information to create a mental representation of the spoken text. In this case, whether EMI teachers are able to make use of effective linguistic resources to facilitate teaching and learning process appears to be vitally important for the successful implementation of curriculum goals. The present study investigates the use of interactive metadiscourse in EMI teachers’ lectures. As a rhetorical device, metadiscourse is an important means of helping audience organise, classify, interpret, and evaluate the information that speakers or writers are trying to convey. Though the function of metadiscourse in knowledge construction is acknowledged, research on metadiscourse in EMI classroom discourse is still scarce. Based on data collected from four EMI courses in two key Chinese universities, this study reveals that EMI teachers employ interactive metadiscourse in lecture organisation, science explanation, knowledge accumulation and knowledge connection. However, they tend to adopt a narrow range of expressions in achieving those purposes,…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hyland and Tse's model, although initially designed for written language, is applicable to the analysis of spoken language, particularly classroom discourse.
“Furthermore, although initially designed for written language, subsequent research has confirmed its applicability to the analysis of spoken language; particularly demonstrating its robust adaptability in classroom discourse analysis (e.g., Lee and Subtirelu 2015;Zhang and Lo 2021;Doiz and Lasagabaster 2022;Rababah et al. 2024;Yılmaz and İlerten 2024).”
From Metadiscourse and Teacher Moves for Supporting Student Reasoning in Linguistics Classroom Interactions (2026) · cites this paper as Zhang and Lo 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Li, J., & Hu, W. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.12793 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zhang, L., & Lo, Y. Y.
- ORCID
- Lo, Yuen Yi
- Venue
- Language Use in English-Medium Instruction at University
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2021-05-19
- Pages
- 56-79
- OpenAlex
- W3156394996
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 58.88
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- English-medium instruction, interactive metadiscourse, knowledge construction, university lectures, teacher discourse, rhetorical devices, knowledge accumulation, knowledge connections, second language learners, Chinese universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review