Cited by 17Discourse Analysis in Language StudiesSecond Language Learning and TeachingEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

EMI Teachers’ Use of Interactive Metadiscourse in Lecture Organisation and Knowledge Construction

Zhang, Lei, Lo, Yuen Yi·2021·Language Use in English-Medium Instruction at University

Abstract

Effective knowledge transmission has been a key issue surrounding EMI. In EMI settings, learning a difficult subject through the medium of the students’ less proficient language may complicate the already challenging task of processing the content as listening to lengthy and information-dense lectures can be mentally challenging for listeners. In academic lectures, listeners need to understand the hierarchic and semantic relationships behind that information to create a mental representation of the spoken text. In this case, whether EMI teachers are able to make use of effective linguistic resources to facilitate teaching and learning process appears to be vitally important for the successful implementation of curriculum goals. The present study investigates the use of interactive metadiscourse in EMI teachers’ lectures. As a rhetorical device, metadiscourse is an important means of helping audience organise, classify, interpret, and evaluate the information that speakers or writers are trying to convey. Though the function of metadiscourse in knowledge construction is acknowledged, research on metadiscourse in EMI classroom discourse is still scarce. Based on data collected from four EMI courses in two key Chinese universities, this study reveals that EMI teachers employ interactive metadiscourse in lecture organisation, science explanation, knowledge accumulation and knowledge connection. However, they tend to adopt a narrow range of expressions in achieving those purposes,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003134534-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hyland and Tse's model, although initially designed for written language, is applicable to the analysis of spoken language, particularly classroom discourse.

    “Furthermore, although initially designed for written language, subsequent research has confirmed its applicability to the analysis of spoken language; particularly demonstrating its robust adaptability in classroom discourse analysis (e.g., Lee and Subtirelu 2015;Zhang and Lo 2021;Doiz and Lasagabaster 2022;Rababah et al. 2024;Yılmaz and İlerten 2024).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, L., & Lo, Y. Y.
Venue
Language Use in English-Medium Instruction at University
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2021-05-19
Pages
56-79
OpenAlex
W3156394996
Cited by
17
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3
FWCI
58.88
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
English-medium instruction, interactive metadiscourse, knowledge construction, university lectures, teacher discourse, rhetorical devices, knowledge accumulation, knowledge connections, second language learners, Chinese universities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review