The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Faunal Dispersal, Reconcentration, and Gnawing Damage to Bone in Terrestrial Environments
Abstract
Gnawing from animal species is a common alteration to human bones and comes under frequent forensic analysis in order to separate these effects from human-caused trauma and to understand the context and postdepositional history of a set of remains. This chapter examines the motivations for (predation, defleshing, fat extraction, incisor sharpening, etc.) and mechanisms of bone gnawing, the typical sequences of body part consumption and long bone destruction, and defines tooth mark types and other bone damage, including pits, scores/striations, punctures, furrows, edge wear, crenellation, peeling, scalloping, and gastric corrosion. This chapter also examines bone dispersal by carnivores and how this common behavior impacts subsequent scene dimensions and searching methods; reconcentration of bones by some species into dens; and distinguishing among size class of carnivores that created tooth marks. The modifications by rodents gnawing on wet or dry bone are also examined, along with modifications made by pigs, other large ungulates (osteophagia), and humans. The overall patterns of skeletal modification by taxon are also examined.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“scavenging degrades the remains, including bones, so that recognition, recovery, and analysis of them are compromised [8].”
From Forensic experiments on animal scavenging: A systematic literature review on what we have and what we need (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indra, L., Lösch, S., Errickson, D., & Finaughty, D. (2023) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2023.111862 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Pokines, J. T.
- Corresponding author
- Pokines, James T.
- ORCID
- Pokines, James T.
- Venue
- Manual of Forensic Taphonomy
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2021-11-02
- Pages
- 295-360
- OpenAlex
- W4226016722
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CRC Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Forensic Entomology and Diptera Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- bone modification, tooth marks, rodent gnawing, forensic osteology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review