Intellectual Character Education: Some Lessons from Vice Epistemology
Abstract
As an applied branch of virtue epistemology, the field of intellectual character education has offered practical guidance for educators who are interested in facilitating intellectual virtues in their classrooms. This chapter explores that practical guidance – i.e., the “standard approach” to facilitating intellectual virtues in classrooms. Section 1 explains the key features of the standard approach. Section 2 uses insights from vice epistemology to draw two lessons for the standard approach. First, since some students are already on their way to developing intellectual vices, they aren’t likely to be helped by the standard approach. Second, tendencies toward intellectual vices may be prevalent among our students and caused by systemic factors. Accordingly, any progress made in the classroom is likely to be ephemeral, if systemic changes aren’t made.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Systemic changes must be made if any progress toward virtues is to be lasting.
“systemic changes must be made, if any progress toward virtues is to be lasting (146).”
From Algorithmic Epistemic Outsourcing and Epistemic Corruption (2026) · cites this paper as Battaly 2022
Progress in ameliorating the corruptive effects of algorithmic epistemic outsourcing will be short-lived unless systemic factors are addressed.
“even if we consider both pedagogical and ameliorative strategies, and supposedly attain some progress at ameliorating the corruptive effects associated with algorithmic epistemic outsourcing, such progress will be short-lived as long as the systemic factors remain unaddressed.”
From Algorithmic Epistemic Outsourcing and Epistemic Corruption (2026) · cites this paper as Battaly 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithmic Epistemic Outsourcing and Epistemic Corruption
Dacles, N. (2026) · Philosophia: International Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.46992/pijp.27.2.a.11
Educating Against Intellectual Vices
Clemente, N. L. (2024) · Ethics and Education · doi:10.1080/17449642.2024.2335133
- Authors
- Battaly, H.
- Corresponding author
- Battaly, Heather
- ORCID
- Battaly, Heather
- Venue
- Handbook of Philosophy of Education
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2022-10-26
- Pages
- 137-148
- OpenAlex
- W4293748037
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Education, Philosophy, and Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Education › Values and Moral Education
- Keywords
- intellectual virtues, intellectual vices, virtue epistemology, standard approach, classroom teaching, systemic factors, student dispositions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review