Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 742

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1

Pachella, Robert G.·2021·Human Information Processing

Abstract

This chapter examines some of the assumptions and principles upon which the interpretation of reaction time measurement is based. It is hoped that the juxtaposition of these sets of issues will lead to the more careful use and interpretation of reaction time measures in the understanding of human information processing. Reaction time most typically is defined as the interval between the presentation of a stimulus to a subject and the subject’s response. Aside from questions about the conditions under which reaction time measures are obtained, the further interpretation of reaction time is dependent upon the experimental logic involved in specific situations. The Additive Factor Method, developed by Sternberg, has as its principal concern the first of the problems discussed above in conjunction with the limitations on the use of the Subtraction Method. There are a number of technical statistical considerations that dictate great caution in the application of this covariance technique to the error problem in reaction time studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003176688-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 742

Metadata

Authors
Pachella, R. G.
Venue
Human Information Processing
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2021-10-14
Pages
41-82
OpenAlex
W1536582093
Cited by
742
References
0
FWCI
32.93
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003176688-2
The paper
Pachella, R. G. (2021). The Interpretation of Reaction Time in Information-Processing Research 1. Human Information Processing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003176688-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.