Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The effects of expectancy and task values on Chinese doctoral students’ anxiety about using English for academic oral communication

Zhang, Yining·2021·Teaching and Researching Chinese EFL/ESL Learners in Higher Education

Abstract

This chapter discusses expectancy-value theory (EVT) to measure two dimensions of such motivation among Chinese doctoral students, based on two waves of data. The first of these waves was collected in the middle of fall semester 2019, and the second, at the end of the same semester. EVT, developed by Eccles et al., is a widely used theory of achievement-motivation, primarily focused on two aspects of learning: expectancy and task value. Only a few studies have looked at the teaching of English for academic oral communication (AOC), despite high AOC ability being integral to academic-English ability in general and thus crucial to students’ prospects of successful research careers. In recent years, the teaching of English as a foreign language in higher-education settings has been shifting from a general-communication focus to English for academic purposes. The chapter understands how motivational factors could predict anxiety.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003178118-8-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barrett, N. E. , & Liu, G.-Z. (2016). Global trends and research aims for English academic oral presentations: Changes, challenges, and opportunities for learning technology. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1227–1271. doi:10.3102/0034654316628296 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y.
Venue
Teaching and Researching Chinese EFL/ESL Learners in Higher Education
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2021-05-19
Pages
150-168
Cited by
2
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.