Male Victims of Sexual Violence and Their Welfare in the Criminal Justice System
Open accessAbstract
Male victims of sexual violence currently receive little attention in the UK, despite a growing number of men reporting sexual offences to the police and seeking psychological support for sexual trauma. Such issues are situated against a backdrop of substantial, gender-specific barriers for men around recognising, disclosing, and seeking support for their victimisation. Additionally, concerns have been raised around the efficacy of police officers in providing support throughout reporting and investigation processes, with findings indicating that male rape victims are often met with disbelief and scepticism and find the Criminal Justice process retraumatising. Increasing understanding around men’s experiences within the Criminal Justice System (CJS) is critical in aiding the production of gender-inclusive, trauma-informed strategies that recognise victims’ gender/sexuality-specific needs. This chapter provides evidence-based, victim-centric guidance on effectively supporting male victims of sexual violence, across the multiple institutions of the UK CJS to ensure gender-specific and inclusive care for victim survivors. It does so by overviewing current issues in the policing and service provision of male rape allegations and by examining men’s welfare in the context of multiple UK CJS institutions. Research conducted in the UK on the welfare of male survivors across key investigative moments is reviewed, from reporting, involvement of third sector victim-support services, officer responses and investigative practices, to referral to the Crown Prosecution Service, before concluding with recommendations for policy and practice.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Male survivors share these concerns, but their experiences are compounded by a lack of dedicated support services and cultural insensitivity within existing networks.
“and while male survivors share these concerns, their experiences are compounded by a lack of dedicated support services and cultural insensitivity within existing networks [5].”
From ‘We don’t talk about that around here’: an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) of South Asian male survivors’ experiences of childhood sexual abuse in the UK (2025) · cites this paper as [5]
The Recommendations and Conclusions section (page unavailable) says specialist services for men have limited resources and low visibility, and that mainstream services often provide support that is not tailored to men's needs. The Introduction and Criminal Justice Outcomes sections also describe challenges shared with female survivors that can be amplified for men. The paper does not specifically establish cultural insensitivity within existing support networks; its discussion concerns inadequate male-specific support. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMen face substantial social and institutional barriers to accessing mental health and criminal justice services.
“Researchers have highlighted how men navigate and make sense of their experiences of sexual violence [1, 2] amid substantial social and institutional barriers to accessing mental health and criminal justice services [3–5].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Fielding, N.G. (1994), 'Cop canteen culture', in T. Newburn and E.A. Stanko (eds), Just Boys Doing Business: Men, Masculinities and Crime, New York: Routledge.
- Hine, B. A., Murphy, A. D., Williams, E., Widanaralalage B. K. (in press). Listening to 'Leading Voices': Using Expert Insight to Identify Challenges to, and Suggestions for the Improvement of Rape Investigation and Prosecution in England and Wales. In E. Johnson (Ed), Contemporary Issues in Criminal Justice.
- McLean, I. A. (2013). The male victim of sexual assault. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 27(1), 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.006 · DOI
- Widanaralalage, B. K. (2022). A solitary place: a phenomenological examination of male-on-male rape and sexual abuse. Doctoral thesis.
- Authors
- Widanaralalage, B. K., Hine, B. A., & Murphy, A. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Westminster (GB)
- University of West London (GB)
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Widanaralalage, B. Kennath
- Venue
- Men and Welfare
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2022-12-02
- Pages
- 140-150
- OpenAlex
- W4310538395
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 14.82
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orcid.org
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- UWL Repository (University of West London) (submittedVersion)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Keywords
- male victims of sexual violence, male rape, criminal justice system, victim support, retraumatization, trauma-informed practice, Crown Prosecution Service
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review