The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Monetary Sovereignty in the Digital Currency Era
Abstract
The topic of ‘monetary sovereignty’ has been brought up in discussions surrounding the launch of global stablecoins. Although not often defined in public statements, monetary sovereignty refers to an economy's ability to set monetary policy and control the value of its currency based on its economic fundamentals. This concept is clarified by distinguishing between money and payment, legal (fiat) currency, legal tender, forced tender, and money backing. It highlights the gap between legal principles and public perception and reflects public policies towards the financial system. The role of government in preserving monetary sovereignty is then explained, as well as the potential risks digital assets acting as money may pose and how policy can alleviate these risks. While digitalisation has not fundamentally changed the nature of money, it is unlikely that global stablecoins will jeopardise monetary sovereignty in developed economies, and retail central bank digital currency issuance is not essential for its preservation. However, political economy reasons suggest that central bank digital currency will probably be launched in most economies, including developing and emerging ones.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Central banks pursue CBDCs to safeguard monetary sovereignty against challenges from private cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and foreign CBDCs”
From From Legal Tender to Prohibition: Competing Paradigms in Central Bank Digital Currency Law (2025) · cites this paper as Pfister, 2023, pp. 35-66
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multi-central bank digital currencies arrangements: a multivocal literature review
Sood, K., & Singh, S. (2024) · China Finance Review International · doi:10.1108/cfri-09-2023-0221 · Cited by 21
For a Political Economy of Central Bank Digital Currency
Pfister, C. (2024) · Revue d économie politique · doi:10.3917/redp.344.0525 · Cited by 6
Self-citationPolitique monétaire et monnaies numériques
Pfister, C. (2023) · Revue d économie financière · doi:10.3917/ecofi.149.0225 · Cited by 5
Self-citationLa souveraineté monétaire à l’ère numérique
Drumetz, F., & Pfister, C. (2026) · Revue d économie financière · doi:10.3917/ecofi.160.0161 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMonetary Sovereignty in the Digital Age
Drumetz, F., & Pfister, C. (2026) · Revue d économie financière · doi:10.3917/e.ecofi.160.0153 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfister, C.
- Affiliations
- Université d'Orléans (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Pfister, Christian
- ORCID
- Pfister, Christian
- Venue
- Digital Assets and the Law
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-12-20
- Issue
- 35-66
- Pages
- 35-66
- OpenAlex
- W4390004764
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 22.54
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Global Financial Crisis and Policies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › European Monetary and Fiscal Policies
- Keywords
- monetary sovereignty, stablecoins, central bank digital currency, legal tender, fiat money, digital assets, financial regulation, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monetary Sovereignty in the Digital Currency Era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003258261-5
- The paper
- Pfister, C. (2023). Monetary Sovereignty in the Digital Currency Era. Digital Assets and the Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003258261-5