At the Breaking Point
Abstract
In this chapter, the authors utilize an intersectional approach to explore how the family experience of mass incarceration is shaped by factors such as race, social class, and place. In addition, the chapter incorporates a discussion of the lived experience of family member incarceration within Idaho, a state dominated by rural communities and small cities. One of the co-authors, a system-involved wife and mother, has been instrumental in developing a support group for families in Idaho dealing with incarceration.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A number of studies have demonstrated the challenges associated with meeting the stipulations of post-release supervision for those facing poverty.
“A number of studies have demonstrated the challenges associated with meeting the stipulations of post-release supervision for those facing poverty (Caputo-Levine and Guitar-Judd 2023; Schenwar and Law 2020;Western 2006;Harris 2016).”
From Indigenous Carceral System Inequalities in the US: A Synthesis of the Literature About the Nature and Sources (2025) · cites this paper as Caputo-Levine and Guitar-Judd 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tabbutt, K. (2025) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.70123 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caputo-Levine, D., & Guitar-Judd, D.
- Venue
- Mass Incarceration in the 21st Century
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-08-03
- Pages
- 149-160
- OpenAlex
- W4385501679
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Keywords
- mass incarceration, intersectionality, race, social class, place, rural communities, Idaho, family support groups, lived experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
