The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Hate U Give:
Abstract
This chapter examines the ways in which The Hate U Give negotiates the complex political and racial realities of today’s America. It begins with an analysis of Black popular culture as a tool through which to fight for racial equality. Next, police brutality is examined, as depicted in The Hate U Give , and, finally, this chapter explores the portrayals of Black characters in the film, among which are the powerful images of Black Americans who resist oppression and stand up for the future of all African Americans in the country. Through interracial and intergenerational relationships, The Hate U Give questions the fantasy of a post-racial America, emphasizing that racism is not a historical past but rather America’s very vivid and violent present.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Still being checked.
Metadata
- Authors
- Konrad, T.
- ORCID
- Konrad, Tatiana
- Venue
- Black Popular Culture and Social Justice
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2022-12-09
- Pages
- 48-64
- OpenAlex
- W4310919960
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema History and Criticism
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Representation
- Keywords
- The Hate U Give, Angie Thomas, Black popular culture, racial equality, police brutality, interracial relationships, intergenerational relations, racism, post-racial America, African American resistance, young adult literature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
