Decentering humanity
Abstract
This chapter focuses on different philosophical and social science paradigms for understanding the fundamental character of the contemporary human and planetary condition. The point of departure is the notion of the “Anthropocene.” Loosely but quite radically, the term defines a new conceptualization of the relationship between humanity and nature. It suggests that we have entered a new geological epoch in which the human species is now the dominant Earth-shaping force. Hereby, it unsettles the philosophical, epistemological, and ontological ground on which the natural sciences as well as the social sciences/humanities have traditionally stood. The notion of the Anthropocene, however, is differently defined within scientific paradigms and, furthermore, questioned and criticized by several scholars as well as activists. Natural scientists regard the Anthropocene as a period in which people and nature are dynamically intertwined and embedded in the biosphere, placing shocks and extreme events as part of this dynamic. Social scientists and humanists generally accept that the human–nature relationship and the relation between time and space have changed, and most of these scholars also agree that human actions have caused unprecedented ecological and socioecological challenges. However, they also disagree on several issues. First, the chapter presents core characteristic of the Anthropocene concept as proposed by natural scientists. It then turns to conceptualizations of the noti…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Anthropocene is a geological era marked by human influence over the planet, in which people and nature are dynamically intertwined and embedded in the biosphere.
“As a geological era marked by human influence over the planet, in which “people and nature are dynamically intertwined and embedded in the biosphere” (Andersen, Hulgaard 2023, 301), the Anthropocene exposes the human threat to the planet's ecology by means of the commodification of the non-human.”
From Preserving Cultural Heritage in Indigenous Pandemic Fiction: “Coming-to” Stories of Resistance in Cherie Dimaline’s <i>The Marrow Thieves</i> (2024) · cites this paper as Andersen, Hulgaard 2023, 301
The Anthropocene exposes the human threat to the planet's ecology by means of the commodification of the non-human.
“As a geological era marked by human influence over the planet, in which “people and nature are dynamically intertwined and embedded in the biosphere” (Andersen, Hulgaard 2023, 301), the Anthropocene exposes the human threat to the planet's ecology by means of the commodification of the non-human.”
From Preserving Cultural Heritage in Indigenous Pandemic Fiction: “Coming-to” Stories of Resistance in Cherie Dimaline’s <i>The Marrow Thieves</i> (2024) · cites this paper as Andersen, Hulgaard 2023, 301
Cited by
Sorted by citations
- Authors
- Andersen, A. S., & Hulgaard, L.
- Affiliations
- Roskilde University (DK)
- Venue
- Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Socioecological Challenges
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-02-02
- Pages
- 301-319
- OpenAlex
- W4319006550
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- RUCforsk (Roskilde University) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Keywords
- Anthropocene, human-nature relationship, anthropos, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, new materialism, posthumanism, postmodernism, critical reflexivity, eco-Marxism, degrowth, scientific paradigms, political paradigms, environmental crisis, planetary conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review