The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modernity and the Holocaust
Open accessAbstract
Mass destruction was the extreme form of antagonism and oppression, yet not all cases of oppression, communal hatred and injustice are ‘like’ the Holocaust. Like everything else in our modern society, the Holocaust was an accomplishment in every respect superior, if measured by the standards that this society has preached and institutionalized. Modern culture as a garden culture constructs its own identity out of distrust of nature. In fact, it defines itself and nature, and the distinction between them, through its endemic distrust of spontaneity and its longing for a better, and necessarily artificial, order. The Holocaust is a by-product of the modern drive to a fully designed, fully controlled world, once the drive is getting out of control and running wild. For many years now historians of the Holocaust have been split into the ‘intentionalist’ and the ‘functionalist’ camps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Kirmayer, L. J., Gone, J. P., & Moses, J. (2014) · Transcultural Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1363461514536358 · Cited by 652
Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview and Introduction to the Special Issue
Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840611410836 · Cited by 585
van IJzendoorn, M. H., Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M. J., & Sagi‐Schwartz, A. (2003) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1023/a:1025706427300 · Cited by 328
Debunking the Stanford Prison Experiment.
Le Texier, T. (2019) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000401 · Cited by 127
After the Genocide: Psychological Perspectives on Victim, Bystander, and Perpetrator Groups
Vollhardt, J. R., & Bilewicz, M. (2013) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12000 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauman, Z.
- Venue
- Social Theory Re-Wired
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-04-28
- Pages
- 300-318
- OpenAlex
- W4367315167
- Cited by
- 1,050
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 474.38
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modernity and the Holocaust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003320609-38
- The paper
- Bauman, Z. (2023). Modernity and the Holocaust. Social Theory Re-Wired. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609-38
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.