Cited by 18Cultural Studies and PostmodernismCybernetics and Technology in SocietyDigital Economy and Work Transformation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Seeing Like a Platform: An Inquiry into the Condition of Digital Modernity

Open access
Törnberg, Petter, Uitermark, Justus·2025·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Power needs abstraction, to make the unwieldy complexity of the social world legible and manageable. The proposition at the heart of Seeing Like a Platform is that digital technology brings new metaphors through which power operates. While industrial modernity saw society as a machinery to be designed according to detailed blueprints, digital modernity views society as organic and alive, to be herded and nudged through digital infrastructures, AI, and algorithms. Seeing Like a Platform explores the history, meaning, and far-reaching consequences of this epistemological shift. From social movements to Wikipedia, from digital platforms to city planning, from social science to media, society is being redefined by ideas from complexity science. While complexity offers a vision of a self-organized society freed from hierarchies and overbearing bureaucracies, it simultaneously enables new forms of domination and control. Through theoretical reflections and case studies, Seeing Like a Platform offers an inquiry into digital modernity. Accessibly written and broad ranging, it is an essential reading for scholars, students, and practitioners in fields such as sociology, political science, urban studies, and technology studies. It will also interest anyone keen to understand the profound impact of digital technologies on governance, social organization, and everyday life. The Open Access version of this book, available at http://www.taylorfrancis.com, has been made available under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003326861

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The two strands of urban literature on digital platforms-material/economic surveillance capitalism and cultural/agency-cannot be treated as separate, as the logic of attention extraction defines the structure of interaction within which creativity, agency, and self-expression operate.

    “This article has argued that the two strands cannot be treated as separate, as the logic of attention extraction defines the structure of interaction within which creativity, agency, and self-expression operate (Törnberg & Uitermark, 2025).”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Törnberg, P., & Uitermark, J.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2025-01-20
OpenAlex
W4406628718
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7
FWCI
38.34
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • University of Warwick
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VI.Veni.201S.006)
  • Economic and Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Cultural Studies and Postmodernism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Keywords
digital modernity, digital platforms, complexity science, digital infrastructure, algorithms, artificial intelligence, digital governance, social organization, self-organization, control and domination, social movements, Wikipedia, urban planning, epistemology of technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review