The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emptying and filling. Maps of inland Africa
Abstract
This chapter intends to reflect on the transformation of blank spaces into mapped places, within the process of colonial appropriation of Africa. With respect to an inland area very far from the coast and isolated, two cartographic documents—created almost a century apart: 1827 and 1924—enabled us to observe the transition from blank space to a topographic survey. The first cartographic document consists of two sheets from the Atlas Universel published by Vandermaelen; the second one is the topographic survey drawn by two Commissions—working jointly from 1922 to 1923—to define the colonial border between French Equatorial Africa and Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. The large blank spaces in the Atlas Universel are filled with the meticulous work of colonial cartographers. The territorial knowledge of the inhabitants was considered unreliable by the Commissioners, basically for racist motives. A carto-humanistic approach highlights the heavy colonial legacy of mapping on the continent, with the view of going beyond the darkness of this long night of domination and submission.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Conventional mapping has long served as a tool of control-filling blank spaces and legitimising top-down interventions under the guise of 'development'.
“Rooted in colonial and technocratic traditions, conventional mapping has long served as a tool of control-filling blank spaces (Pase 2024) and legitimising topdown interventions under the guise of 'development'.”
From Teaching a Geography of Hope (2026) · cites this paper as Pase 2024
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pepa, M. (2026) · Area · doi:10.1111/area.70089
Metadata
- Authors
- Pase, A.
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Cartographic Humanities
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2024-04-02
- Pages
- 235-245
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review