The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Drawing (on) cartographic intimacies
Abstract
This chapter provides both a conceptual and practice-based perspective on the ways in which emotions can be grasped, and spatially interpreted, through creative and critical map-centred activities. It also highlights the potential of the cartographic humanities to access inner worlds differently, by enhancing understanding of the psychic, somatic and social dimensions of one’s being through body mapping experiences. Drawing on examples from the HuMaps Lab (Laboratory of Cartographic Humanities) in which undergraduates mapped out both personal and larger public stories by drawing and assembling pieces of literary, visual, lyric and video narratives, the emotional force of mapping is unfolded in the terms of ‘cartographic intimacies’; here, maps are addressed as infrastructures of feelings, deep surfaces that emerge out of visceral emotions but conceived to be shareable with the outside, driving dis -orientations toward—as well as agitation and care for—humans, non-humans, memories, bodies and places.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mapping can become a powerful tool of critical pedagogy.
“Mapping can thus become a powerful tool of critical pedagogy (Lo Presti 2024), one that engages students to move beyond representation to engage affective and political dimensions of knowledge production.”
From Teaching a Geography of Hope (2026) · cites this paper as Lo Presti 2024
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pepa, M. (2026) · Area · doi:10.1111/area.70089
Metadata
- Authors
- Presti, L. L.
- ORCID
- Presti, Laura Lo
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Cartographic Humanities
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2024-04-02
- Pages
- 311-320
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review