Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Information without knowledge: the effects of Internet search on learning

Fisher, Matthew, Smiley, Adam H., Grillo, Tito L. H.·2022·Memory Online

Abstract

The Internet has radically shifted how people access information. Instead of storing information internally, increasingly, people outsource to the Internet and retrieve it when needed. While this is an efficient strategy in many ways, its downstream consequences remain largely unexplored. This research examines how accessing online information impacts how people remember information in a learning context. Across five experiments, participants studied for a quiz either by searching online to access relevant information or by directly receiving that same information without online search. Those who searched the Internet performed worse in the learning assessment, indicating that they stored less new knowledge in internal memory. However, participants who searched the Internet were as confident, or even more confident, that they had mastered the study material compared to those who did not search online. We argue that, by making information retrievability salient, Internet search reduces the likelihood of information being stored in memory. Further, these results suggest that searching online leads to the misattribution of online information to internal memory, thus masking the Internet-induced learning deficits.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003357360-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Searching the Internet reduces the amount of information retained in memory compared to cases where participants read identical texts directly, bypassing the internet search stage.

    “This leads to overconfidence in one's knowledge (Ward, 2021) and, at the same time, reduces the amount of information retained in memory compared to cases where participants read identical texts directly, bypassing the internet search stage (Fisher et al., 2022).”

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, M., Smiley, A. H., & Grillo, T. L. H.
Venue
Memory Online
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2022-12-30
Pages
7-19
Cited by
0
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review