Cited by 1Literacy and Educational PracticesThemes in Literature AnalysisReading and Literacy Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Understanding Teenagers' Experiences of Reading Fiction

Open access
Santi, Elena, Cebula, Katie, McGeown, Sarah·2024·The Reading Lives of Teens

Abstract

Research illustrates that the teenage years are associated with a lack of reading engagement, as reading enjoyment and frequency of reading decline from childhood into early adolescence (e.g., Clark et al., 2023 ). However, this is not the case for all young teenagers: many continue to read and report a broad range of rich and diverse reading experiences. In this chapter, we will share the results from a project which sought to understand avid teenage readers&s; reading experiences, based on interviews carried out with 37 readers (27 female, 10 male) aged 12–14, from two secondary schools. Thematic analysis illustrated that different genres of narrative fiction offered readers different types of reading experiences, for example, enjoyment, immersion, escapism and learning. Interestingly, while specific genres of narrative fiction were generally found to lead to similar reading experiences (e.g., fantasy – escapism, comedy – entertainment), readers&s; own lives and personal experiences also influenced their experiences with different text types. Indeed, readers described actively constructing experiences beyond the text by using their imagination, immersing themselves in the story, and experiencing escapism. As the same story can be perceived differently by different readers, this chapter will explore how book genre, and teenage readers&s; own interactions with a book, can influence their fiction book reading experiences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781032619804-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was considerable variation in participants' preferred genres, including mystery and crime, adventure, fantasy, real-life fiction, historical fiction and comedy.

    “there was considerable variation in participants ' preferred genres, with mystery and crime, adventure, fantasy, real-life fiction, historical fiction and comedy mentioned during the interviews (Santi et al., 2024)”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Santi, E., Cebula, K., & McGeown, S.
Venue
The Reading Lives of Teens
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2024-09-19
Pages
87-105
OpenAlex
W4402649757
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
teenage readers, fiction reading, reading experience, escapism, immersion, reading for pleasure, fantasy, comedy, reader imagination, high school students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review