The DOI matches its Crossref record.
This Academy Will Not Make Us “Bad”
Abstract
The chapter offers an immersion in the experience of co-authoring we shared during two writing retreats in a home by the sea in Sardinia. It is a narration from intimate moments when, as precarious transfeminist researchers, we explored the entanglement of our academic and political positionalities with our friendship. We recognise in the feminist co-authoring shared between friends a tool to care and resist the individualisation and isolation of neoliberal academia. We envision this form of co-authorship as a means to recognise and address the forms of oppression perpetuated by this academy, and as a reflexive practice to help prevent us from perpetuating them ourselves. Therefore, we advance the hypothesis that feminist co-authoring could turn into a political practice to resist the potential oppressor that lies within us, and to fight it, trying to not become “bad”.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teaching hope requires an ongoing and intentional engagement with practices of self-love, the nurturing of critical academic friendships, and the enabling of creative forms of resistance.
“Teaching hope requires an ongoing and intentional engagement with practices of self-love, the nurturing of critical academic friendships (Acetino et al. 2025), and the enabling of creative forms of resistance that unsettle the dominant paradigms of academia (Palermo et al. 2025).”
From Teaching a Geography of Hope (2026) · cites this paper as Palermo et al. 2025
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pepa, M. (2026) · Area · doi:10.1111/area.70089
Metadata
- Authors
- Palermo, G., Salimbeni, A., & Simone, A.
- Venue
- Co-authoring Feminist and Queer Geographies
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2025-09-30
- Pages
- 210-222
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
