Cited by 1Library Science and Information LiteracyInformation Science and LibrariesRisk Perception and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introducing risk-informed information practice

Hicks, Alison·2025·Risk-Informed Information Practice

Abstract

What is risk-informed information practice and why is it important? This chapter establishes and sets out the premise for risk-informed information practice, including through presenting key concepts and highlighting the value of exploring the relationship between information literacy and risk in more detail. The chapter starts by defining and presenting the two entwined concepts that form the basis for the theorisation of risk-informed information practice, information literacy and risk. These sections subsequently pave the way for the definition of risk-informed information practice, which is presented in relation to a series of initial guiding themes and concepts. The chapter then establishes the three case studies, which in focusing on key dimensions of risk- risk perception, risk understanding and risk management- establish the basis for the elaboration of risk-informed information practice. The chapter finishes with an overview of the structure of the book as well as its overarching purpose.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781032719627-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hicks, A.
Corresponding author
Hicks, Alison
Venue
Risk-Informed Information Practice
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2025-03-05
Pages
1-16
OpenAlex
W4408129785
Cited by
0
References
0
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Information Science and Libraries
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Risk Perception and Management
Keywords
information literacy, risk, risk perception, risk understanding, risk management, information seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review