The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior
Abstract
This chapter proposes a statistical method for investigating network structure together with relevant actor attributes as joint dependent variables in a longitudinal framework, assuming that data have been collected according to a panel design. It discusses the specification of the stochastic model for dynamics of networks and behavior and then proceeds to parameter estimation and model selection. The chapter analyses network-behavioral coevolution and parameter estimation. It addresses Goodness-of-fit issues and model selection. The chapter presents a statistical model for the simultaneous, mutually dependent, dynamics of a relation on a given set of social actors, and the behavior of these actors as represented by one or more ordinal categorical variables. The process of network-behavioral coevolution is regarded as an emergent group-level result of the network actors’ individual decisions. Whereas the rate functions model the timing of the different actors’ different types of decisions, the objective functions model which changes are made.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
Sahlins, M., & Graeber, D. (2017) · Routledge (orig. 1972) · doi:10.4324/9781315184951 · Cited by 3,159
Primary socialization theory: the etiology of drug use and deviance. I
Oetting, E. R., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (1998) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826089809056252 · Cited by 419
Cited by
Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics
Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004 · Cited by 2,103
Self-citationDistinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks
Aral, S., Muchnik, L., & Sundararajan, A. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908800106 · Cited by 1,207
Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0350 · Cited by 659
Van Zalk, M. H. W., Kerr, M., Branje, S. J. T., Stattin, H., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2010) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0019661 · Cited by 157
Cheadle, J. E., & Schwadel, P. (2012) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.014 · Cited by 149
Metadata
- Authors
- Snijders, T., Steglich, C., & Schweinberger, M.
- Venue
- Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-09-29
- Pages
- 41-71
- OpenAlex
- W2561773797
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 51.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315091655-3
- The paper
- Snijders, T., Steglich, C., & Schweinberger, M. (2017). Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior. Longitudinal Models in the Behavioral and Related Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315091655-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.