Consumption and contribution in the digital era
Abstract
This chapter completes the consideration of the digital and finishes by assessing where the practice of journalism sits now in relation to its own discursive and definitional parameters as well as from the perspective of its practitioners. It begins by reflecting on the diverse nature of contributors to journalism through history before looking at the extent to which the potential for contemporary consumers to act and participate in the construction of news on social media and well as through conventional news sites poses a threat to the continuation of an identifiable journalism profession. It looks at how news is now consumed and circulated by actors outside the confines of a professional core and what implications this has for professional journalists. It considers how journalism has tried to incorporate contributions and feedback from its audience as well as the ways in which journalists have continued to define their own professional territory and the distinctiveness of their contributions as well as their organisations’ brands. In considering how journalists have adapted to social media and novel platforms for news production and the generation of opinion, we consider what added value can journalists provide through the affordances of live-blogs and Twitter.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Modern information consumers tend to be more interactive; they do not just passively receive information but also engage in discussions, comment, and participate in various forms of online interaction.
“Modern information consumers tend to be more interactive. They do not just passively receive information but also engage in discussions, comment, and participate in various forms of online interaction.”
From CHANGES IN PUBLIC INFORMATION CONSUMPTION PATTERNS IN THE DIGITAL ERA: A LITERATURE STUDY ON DIGITAL JOURNALISM (2025) · cites this paper as Conboy, 2023
This interactivity creates digital communities around certain issues, which can provide richer perspectives but requires users to have critical thinking skills in assessing the credibility of information.
“This interactivity creates digital communities around certain issues, which can provide richer perspectives but again, requires users to have critical thinking skills in assessing the credibility of information.(Conboy, 2023).”
From CHANGES IN PUBLIC INFORMATION CONSUMPTION PATTERNS IN THE DIGITAL ERA: A LITERATURE STUDY ON DIGITAL JOURNALISM (2025) · cites this paper as Conboy, 2023
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sulistiani, I., Caroline, C., & Syarifuddin (2025) · MORFAI JOURNAL · doi:10.54443/morfai.v5i1.2544
- Authors
- Conboy, M.
- Corresponding author
- Conboy, Martin
- ORCID
- Conboy, Martin
- Venue
- Journalism, Technology and Cultural Practice
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2023-02-10
- Pages
- 151-174
- OpenAlex
- W4319982526
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- journalism, audience participation, news consumption, social media, journalism profession, journalistic identity, audience feedback, live blogging, Twitter, news production, digital media, journalism history
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review