The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
National framing and local reframing of students’ transition to higher education in France
Abstract
This chapter focuses on the policy processes concerning the transition between secondary and higher education (HE) in France and, more precisely, on policy decisions at the national level and their reception at the local level. It uses the concepts of ‘framing’ and ‘reframing’ to describe the different ways in which national and local actors bind ideological and axiological messages and materialise them into organisational and technical tools. The empirical evidence is drawn from a comprehensive study on the role of institutions, markets, and networks in guidance and access to HE. The chapter is organised in three sections. The first presents the theoretical framework and the objects and methods of the empirical study. The second examines the ideas, instruments, and institutional arrangements launched at the national level, while the third focuses on the ways in which local actors working in different contexts interpret and react to these frames. The conclusion points out some of the main limitations and negatives consequences of these processes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Toutefois les résistances des personnels du secondaire (van Zanten et al ., 2018), comme du supérieur à l'égard de ces nouvelles tâches qui alourdissent leur travail sans être accompagnées de nouvelles incitations, font le lit de l'État-plateforme et de la concurrence généralisée qu'il instaure entre des usagers inégalement capables de comprendre et d'utiliser de façon stratégique les principes et”
From Le rôle des instruments dans la sélection des bacheliers dans l’enseignement supérieur. La nouvelle gouvernance des affectations par les algorithmes (2019) · cites this paper as van Zanten et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Frouillou, L., Pin, C., & van Zanten, A. (2019) · Sociologie · doi:10.3917/socio.102.0209 · Cited by 45
van Zanten, A. (2019) · Comparative Education · doi:10.1080/03050068.2019.1619330 · Cited by 23
Self-citationEgido, M. P., & Martínez-Novillo, J. R. (2020) · Papers Revista de Sociologia · doi:10.5565/rev/papers.2777 · Cited by 11
Sánchez-Cabrero, R. (2023) · Revista Española de Educación Comparada · doi:10.5944/reec.43.2023.33718 · Cited by 7
González, S., & Aupetit, S. D. (2024) · Policy Reviews in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/23322969.2024.2394056 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Zanten, A. V., Olivier, A., Oller, A.-C., & Uhly, K.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
- Venue
- Educational Choices, Transitions and Aspirations in Europe
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-06-13
- Pages
- 149-166
- OpenAlex
- W2994727462
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Education, sociology, and vocational training
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Governance and Development
- Keywords
- transition to higher education, secondary-to-university transition, education policy, framing, reframing, student guidance, higher education access, policy implementation, France
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review