Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The MLAT at 60 Years

Stansfield, Charles W., Reed, Daniel J.·2019·Language Aptitude

Abstract

The Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) was developed by John B. Carroll and Stanley S. Sapon in the late 1950s. This chapter begins with a review of Carroll’s conceptualization of language aptitude. It reviews the adaptations of the MLAT that have been developed in several languages. These include French, Arabic, Braille, Mandarin, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Russian and Spanish. Of these, the most successful version is the French version, which was developed in Canada and is used along with the English version by multiple agencies of the government of Canada. Both the English and French versions have been used to identify whether students with a propensity to learn do better through an analytic approach or a functional approach. The chapter includes a discussion of the validity of the MLAT and the need for more forms, including an online version. Additional uses of the MLAT are also covered. These include using the test to determine the time needed to reach a certain level of proficiency in the language, using part scores to create a diagnostic profile of the student and by psychologists, as part of a process to determine if a student has a foreign language learning disability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315122021-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research over many years has found that the MLAT is a reliable predictor of overall L2 achievement.

    “The first finding is in accord with research over many years which has found that the MLAT is a reliable predictor of overall L2 achievement (e.g., see Ehrman & Oxford, 1995;Skehan, 1998;Stansfield & Reed, 2019).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Carroll, J. B. (Ed.). (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Boston: MIT Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Stansfield, C. W., & Reed, D. J.
Venue
Language Aptitude
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2019-05-02
Pages
15-32
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review