The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The MLAT at 60 Years
Abstract
The Modern Language Aptitude Test (MLAT) was developed by John B. Carroll and Stanley S. Sapon in the late 1950s. This chapter begins with a review of Carroll’s conceptualization of language aptitude. It reviews the adaptations of the MLAT that have been developed in several languages. These include French, Arabic, Braille, Mandarin, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Polish, Russian and Spanish. Of these, the most successful version is the French version, which was developed in Canada and is used along with the English version by multiple agencies of the government of Canada. Both the English and French versions have been used to identify whether students with a propensity to learn do better through an analytic approach or a functional approach. The chapter includes a discussion of the validity of the MLAT and the need for more forms, including an online version. Additional uses of the MLAT are also covered. These include using the test to determine the time needed to reach a certain level of proficiency in the language, using part scores to create a diagnostic profile of the student and by psychologists, as part of a process to determine if a student has a foreign language learning disability.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research over many years has found that the MLAT is a reliable predictor of overall L2 achievement.
“The first finding is in accord with research over many years which has found that the MLAT is a reliable predictor of overall L2 achievement (e.g., see Ehrman & Oxford, 1995;Skehan, 1998;Stansfield & Reed, 2019).”
From The prediction from MLAT to L2 achievement is largely due to MLAT assessment of underlying L1 abilities (2023) · cites this paper as Stansfield & Reed, 2019
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Carroll, J. B. (Ed.). (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Boston: MIT Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sparks, R. L., & Dale, P. S. (2023) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263123000037 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Stansfield, C. W., & Reed, D. J.
- Venue
- Language Aptitude
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-05-02
- Pages
- 15-32
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review