Freedom of thought, belief and religion and freedom of expression and opinion
Abstract
The State party should ensure the real and effective implementation of the right to peaceful assembly and freedom of association for all migrant workers, without the exercise of these rights becoming grounds for loss of employment or for the deportation of the persons involved. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee Dominican Republic 12–30 March 2012.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Various international law frameworks recognise a right not to have one's thoughts or opinions revealed or manipulated.
“Various international law frameworks recognise a right not to have one’s thoughts or opinions revealed [35] or manipulated [36].”
From Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement
Gordon, E. C., & Seth, A. K. (2024) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002899 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Alegre, S.
- Corresponding author
- Alegre, Susie
- Venue
- Human Rights of Migrants in the 21st Century
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-08-24
- Pages
- 72-77
- OpenAlex
- W2905437371
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Religious Freedom and Discrimination
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Immigration Law and Human Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Immigration
- Keywords
- freedom of thought, conscience and religion, freedom of expression, freedom of assembly, freedom of association, migrant workers, deportation, employment discrimination, Dominican Republic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
