Empathy machines
Abstract
Dr. Turkle builds on arguments she advanced about the power of presence that she advanced in Alone Together (2011) and Reclaiming Conversation ( 2015 ). Here she explores the disembodiment that is at the heart of the “flight from conversation” and splitting of attention when we use our digital devices. Turkle questions the implications for the body in analysis in a world in which increasingly more people would rather text than converse face-to-face. It “normalizes” analysis by Skype, but should this be normalized? Additionally, Turkle looks at the implications for the body when we become open to interacting with machines ‘as if’ they were embodied with the richness of human experience. This is relevant to the future of psychotherapy, a future in which automated therapists are currently proposed. Turkle describes that when we are tempted by automated programs as therapists, we risk entering into the disembodied realm of the ‘as if,’ and also risk treating other humans as if they too were disembodied. Turkle is an analytically trained clinician who works closely with roboticists and champions of AI. From work in that research environment, she is able to explore the of what she has called “the robotic moment” (our willingness to treat machines as though they were worthy of conversation about human matters) and virtual reality, our willingness to accept what is not real as “real enough.” What does our vulnerability to these technologies say about our relationship to psychoanalysi…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prolonged exposure to simulated relationships that disregard refusal, override emotional withdrawal, or reward relentless attention-seeking can normalize blurred boundaries and foster misconceptions about what constitutes care, intimacy, or agency in human relationships.
“Prolonged exposure to simulated relationships that disregard refusal, override emotional withdrawal, or reward relentless attention-seeking can normalize blurred boundaries and foster misconceptions about what constitutes care, intimacy, or agency in human relationships (Giles 2002;Turkle 2017).”
From Toward an Ethic of Synthetic Relationality: Identity, Intimacy, and Risk in AI-Mediated Roleplay Environments (2025) · cites this paper as Turkle 2017
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bhat, M. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1609/aies.v8i1.36560 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Turkle, S.
- Corresponding author
- Turkle, Sherry
- Venue
- A Psychoanalytic Exploration of the Body in Today’s World
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-10-25
- Pages
- 17-27
- OpenAlex
- W2963734156
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Keywords
- disembodiment, digital devices, text messaging, Skype, psychoanalysis, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, embodiment, human-robot interaction, future of psychotherapy, presence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review