The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Understanding Social Accountability: Politics, Power and Building New Social Contracts
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SP programmes are often assumed to deepen and strengthen the relationship between the state and citizens by creating a new social contract dynamic in which citizens feel empowered to demand their rights from the state (Hickey & King, 2018).”
From Citizens’ Claims‐Making and Navigating the Politics of Accountability in Social Cash Transfers in Uganda (2025) · cites this paper as Hickey & King, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El Assal, A. (2025) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.11237
Metadata
- Authors
- Hickey, S., & King, S.
- Venue
- The Social and Political Potential of Cash Transfers
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-10-11
- Pages
- 139-154
- OpenAlex
- W4231270315
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Human Rights and Development
- Keywords
- social accountability, social contract, politics, power, governance, citizen participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Social Accountability: Politics, Power and Building New Social Contracts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315228747-10
- The paper
- Hickey, S., & King, S. (2018). Understanding Social Accountability: Politics, Power and Building New Social Contracts. The Social and Political Potential of Cash Transfers. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315228747-10
