Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,002

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies'

·2017·Political Accountability

Abstract

Parliamentary democracy is the world’s most popular political project. About a third of the world’s population live under this form of regime, and their numbers have never been greater. By and large, the great majority o f those citizens accept parliamentarism as a legitimate vehicle for popular representation. Likewise, among the scholarly community, parliamentary democracy has found widespread support (e.g., Linz & Valenzuela 1994; Moe & Caldwell 1994; Weaver & Rockman 1993). Yet, parliamentarism may be more widely admired than understood. Those who have debated the merits of parliamentary government have generally assumed that although the effects of parliamentarism may not be obvious, its essential features are well defined and understood. This is not necessarily so, however.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315246567-15

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,002

Metadata

Venue
Political Accountability
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-03-02
Pages
141-170
OpenAlex
W2094678909
Cited by
1,002
References
0
FWCI
325.84
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies'. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315246567-15
The paper
‘Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies'. (2017). Political Accountability. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315246567-15

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.