The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
Some isnad -analytical methods illustrated on the basis of several woman- demeaning sayings from hadith literature
Abstract
In the canonical tradition literature of Islam generalizations about women are legion. In the following an attempt will be undertaken to trace a few of the more demeaning generalizations to their respective originators.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“G.H.A. Juynboll developed the phenomenon of the common link originally mentioned in a footnote by Schacht into a comprehensive dating method.”
From The Deconstruction of the Common Link Theory: Harald Motzki’s Methodological Critique of G.H.A. Juynboll’s Skepticism in Hadith Dating: Kritik Harald Motzki Terhadap Teori Common Link Juynboll (2025) · cites this paper as Juynboll, 1989
Citations
Cited by
Junus, I. J., Wahyudin, D. M., Najib, M., Masrur, A., & Nur, S. (2025) · Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis · doi:10.15575/diroyah.v10i1.47688 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Juynboll, G. H. A.
- Venue
- Hadith
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-12-05
- Pages
- 175-216
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Some isnad -analytical methods illustrated on the basis of several woman- demeaning sayings from hadith literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315253695-10
- The paper
- Juynboll, G. H. A. (2016). Some isnad -analytical methods illustrated on the basis of several woman- demeaning sayings from hadith literature. Hadith. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315253695-10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.