The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents
Abstract
Drawing on political, legal, national, post-national, as well as American and European perspectives, this collection of essays offers a diverse and balanced discussion of the current arguments concerning deliberative democracy. Its contributions' focus on discontent, provide a critical assessment of the benefits of deliberation and also respond to the strongest criticisms of the idea of democratic deliberation. The essays consider the three basic questions of why, how and where to deliberate democratically. This book will be of value not only to political and democratic theorists, but also to legal philosophers and constitutional theorists, and all those interested in the legitimacy of decision-making in national and post-national pluralistic polities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science
Thompson, D. F. (2008) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.081306.070555 · Cited by 987
The threat of algocracy: reality, resistance and accommodation
Danaher, J. (2016) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-015-0211-1 · Cited by 519
European Demoicracy and Its Crisis
Nicolaïdis, K. (2013) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/jcms.12006 · Cited by 304
The Case for Demoicracy in the European Union*
Cheneval, F., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2013) · JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02262.x · Cited by 277
Norms of Deliberation: An Inductive Study
Mansbridge, J., Hartz-Karp, J., Amengual, M., & Gastil, J. (2006) · Journal of Deliberative Democracy · doi:10.16997/jdd.35 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-03-02
- OpenAlex
- W588289336
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.41
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315258249
- The paper
- Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents. (2017). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315258249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
