The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Buddhism as Philosophy: An Introduction
Abstract
Contents: Preface Buddhism as philosophy? Early Buddhism: basic teachings Non-self: empty persons Buddhist ethics A Nyaya interlude Abhidharma: the metaphysics of empty persons The rise of Mahayana Yogacara: impressions-only and the denial of physical objects Madhyamaka: the doctrine of emptiness The school of Dinnaga: Buddhist epistemology. Index.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Fusion philosophy, as I (following Siderits and others) will call this form of philosophy for convenience, has demonstrated the viability of signi fi cant philosophical work that is both post-comparative and potentially global”
From Global philosophy of religion(s) (2020) · cites this paper as Siderits (2017)
In the citing paper
“However, this discussion of terminology may be a distraction, for, as Siderits and others have noted, the lack of a commonly agreed on term is unproblematic because once this way of doing philosophy becomes normal rather than exceptional a special term will be unnecessary (Siderits ( ), ).”
From Global philosophy of religion(s) (2020) · cites this paper as Siderits (2017)
In the citing paper
“Following Mark Siderits ( ) and others, a philosophical tradition can be considered as constituted by the lineage of those who have contributed to it and those who are su ffi ciently well trained to be in conversation with them.”
From Global philosophy of religion(s) (2020) · cites this paper as Siderits (2017)
In the citing paper
“A philosophical tradition is made up of instances of philosophizing with certain kinds of causal connections, both direct and indirect, with one another. (Siderits ( ), )”
From Global philosophy of religion(s) (2020) · cites this paper as Siderits (2017)
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Global philosophy of religion(s)
HARRISON, V. S. (2020) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412519000647 · Cited by 17
Prueitt, C. (2018) · Sophia · doi:10.1007/s11841-017-0618-5 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Siderits, M.
- Corresponding author
- Siderits, Mark
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-03-02
- OpenAlex
- W1518627244
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 22.66
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Keywords
- early Buddhism, non-self, emptiness, Buddhist ethics, Nyāya, Abhidharma, Mahayana Buddhism, Yogācāra, Madhyamaka, Buddhist epistemology, metaphysics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
