The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Barriers and Accident Prevention
Abstract
Accidents are preventable, but only if they are correctly described and understood. Since the mid-1980s accidents have come to be seen as the consequence of complex interactions rather than simple threads of causes and effects. Yet progress in accident models has not been matched by advances in methods. The author's work in several fields (aviation, power production, traffic safety, healthcare) made it clear that there is a practical need for constructive methods and this book presents the experiences and the state-of-the-art. The focus of the book is on accident prevention rather than accident analysis and unlike other books, has a proactive rather than reactive approach. The emphasis on design rather than analysis is a trend also found in other fields. Features of the book include: -A classification of barrier functions and barrier systems that will enable the reader to appreciate the diversity of barriers and to make informed decisions for system changes. -A perspective on how the understanding of accidents (the accident model) largely determines how the analysis is done and what can be achieved. The book critically assesses three types of accident models (sequential, epidemiological, systemic) and compares their strengths and weaknesses. -A specific accident model that captures the full complexity of systemic accidents. One consequence is that accidents can be prevented through a combination of performance monitoring and barrier functions, rather than through the elimination or encapsulation of causes. -A clearly described methodology for barrier analysis and accident prevention. Written in an accessible style, Barriers and Accident Prevention is designed to provide a stimulating and practical guide for industry professionals familiar with the general ideas of accidents and human error. The book is directed at those involved with accident analysis and system safety, such as managers of safety departments, risk and safety consultants, human factors professionals, and accident investigators. It is applicable to all major application areas such as aviation, ground transportation, maritime, process industries, healthcare and hospitals, communication systems, and service providers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation
Aven, T. (2016) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023 · Cited by 1,713
“Alternative methods have been developed, of which FRAM and STAMP are among the most well-known ( Hollnagel, 2004; Leveson 2004 , 2011 ).”
MethodTowards a Conceptual Framework for Resilience Engineering
Madni, A. M., & Jackson, S. (2009) · IEEE Systems Journal · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2009.2017397 · Cited by 649
Five System Barriers to Achieving Ultrasafe Health Care
Amalberti, R., Auroy, Y., Berwick, D., & Barach, P. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-142-9-200505030-00012 · Cited by 599
Systems-based accident analysis methods: A comparison of Accimap, HFACS, and STAMP
Salmon, P. M., Cornelissen, M., & Trotter, M. J. (2012) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.11.009 · Cited by 437
Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures
Zio, E. (2016) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollnagel, E.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-12-05
- OpenAlex
- W1499582806
- Cited by
- 846
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Barriers and Accident Prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315261737
- The paper
- Hollnagel, E. (2016). Barriers and Accident Prevention. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315261737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.