The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Four Guiding Principles for Arts-Based Research Practice
Abstract
Arts-based research (ABR) educational scholars often engage in experiments of process and reward articulations of intentions as much as final products. Self-study ABR work might consider the role other human and nonhuman agents play. So, where do social science researchers turn for a guiding principle regarding ABR's aesthetic quality and impact in education? The postmodern turn has left many arts-based researchers with great confusion regarding what, if any, method can be used to understand or serve any group of not one individuals. While an artist might consider copyright, a researcher must consider human subjects' voluntary and informed consent, as well as the risks and benefits of others' participation. Data collection invites readers to reflect on the principle of subjectivity and public good in each of audiences as works of art. Public good can be obtained when scholartists explore topics with complexity for more multifaceted understanding.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poetic inquiry treats form as consequential: it creates methodological space to evoke rather than explain, to foreground ambiguity rather than resolve it, and to attend to affective and ethical dimensions of lived experience that can slip past conventional analytic procedures.
“Poetic inquiry extends this claim by treating form as consequential: it creates methodological space to evoke rather than explain, to foreground ambiguity rather than resolve it, and to attend to the affective and ethical dimensions of lived experience that can slip past conventional analytic procedures (Cahnmann-Taylor, 2017; Faulkner, 2020; Prendergast, 2009, 2022; Wu, 2021).”
From Echoes in Translation: Reassembling Teacher Voice Through Poetic Inquiry (2026) · cites this paper as Cahnmann-Taylor, 2017
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Appleby, R. , & Pennycook, A. (2017). Swimming with sharks, ecological feminism and posthuman language politics. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 14(2–3), 1–23. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Echoes in Translation: Reassembling Teacher Voice Through Poetic Inquiry
Le, T. T., & Pham, T. T. (2026) · International Journal of Education and the Arts · doi:10.59236/ijea27n22
Metadata
- Authors
- Cahnmann-Taylor, M.
- Venue
- Arts-Based Research in Education
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Pages
- 247-258
- OpenAlex
- W2908303678
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 24.46
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art Education and Development
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Keywords
- arts-based research, research ethics, informed consent, human subjects research, postmodernism, aesthetic quality, public goods, subjectivity, non-human actors, educational research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
