Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tobacco, Pipes, and Race in Colonial Virginia

Agbe-Davies, Anna S·2016

Abstract

Tobacco, Pipes, and Race in Colonial Virginia investigates the economic and social power that surrounded the production and use of tobacco pipes in colonial Virginia and the difficulty of correlating objects with cultural identities. A common artifact in colonial period sites, previous publications on this subject have focused on the decorations on the pipes or which ethnic group produced and used the pipes, “European,” “African,” or “Indian.” This book weaves together new interpretations, analytical techniques, classification schemes, historical background, and archaeological methods and theory. Special attention is paid to the subfield of African diaspora research to display the complexities of understanding this class of material culture. This fascinating study is accessible to the undergraduate reader, as well as to graduate students and scholars.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315416694

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Archaeologists interested in African America have engaged transdisciplinary realms of theory including critical race theory and whiteness, semiotics and pragmatism, and Black feminist theory.

    “Archaeologists interested in African America have engaged a number of transdisciplinary realms of theory, including critical race theory and whiteness (Bell 2005, Epperson 2004, González-Tennant & González-Tennant 2016, McDavid 2007, Palmer 2011, Palus 2011, White 2017), semiotics and pragmatism (Agbe-Davies 2016, 2017;Dawdy 2005;Jeppson 2007;McDavid 2002;Morris 2017;Planto 2021), and, most”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Agbe-Davies 2016

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Agbe-Davies, A. S.
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2016-06-03
Cited by
12
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review