The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Towards a theory of instruction
Abstract
This chapter outlines a theory of instruction explicitly focusing on the various aspects of the mind discussed in this book. We discuss how learning in schools would have to be organized to strengthen the operation and development of mental processes involved in the architecture of the mind. This chapter is organized into two sections. In the first section we present the general principles derived from our theory for education. For instance, education must (i) cater for all four types of processes involved in the four-fold mental architecture and (ii) saturate the developmental needs and priorities of each cycle; plan learning in each cycle under the perspective of learning at earlier and later phases; take into account the possibilities for handling complexity typically associated with each grade; bridge educational timing and developmental timing, causing controlled conceptual change in children following the principles of cognitive developmental science rather than the history of knowledge in scientific disciplines. In the second section we present the implementation of these principles for the various aspects of the developing mind, according to developmental cycles which correspond to major levels in education, such as kindergarten and preschool, primary, and secondary education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations
Ainsworth, S. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001 · Cited by 1,673
Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis
Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/0307507022000011525 · Cited by 586
Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies from a teacher’s perspective
Sentance, S., & Csizmadia, A. (2017) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-016-9482-0 · Cited by 361
Full immersive virtual environment CAVETM in chemistry education
Limniou, M., Roberts, D., & Papadopoulos, N. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.014 · Cited by 276
Autonomy, self-direction and self access in language teaching and learning: The history of an idea
Gremmo, M.-J., & Riley, P. (1995) · System · doi:10.1016/0346-251x(95)00002-2 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Demetriou, A., & Spanoudis, G.
- Venue
- Growing Minds
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-02-05
- Pages
- 247-272
- OpenAlex
- W2907565928
- Cited by
- 664
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 101.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a theory of instruction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315537375-17
- The paper
- Demetriou, A., & Spanoudis, G. (2018). Towards a theory of instruction. Growing Minds. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315537375-17
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.