Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 44Ethics and Social Impacts of AICriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisRace, Genetics, and Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage

Gandy, Oscar H.·2016·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

The application of probability and statistics to an ever-widening number of life-decisions serves to reproduce, reinforce, and widen disparities in the quality of life that different groups of people can enjoy. As a critical technology assessment, the ways in which bad luck early in life increase the probability that hardship and loss will accumulate across the life course are illustrated. Analysis shows the ways in which individual decisions, informed by statistical models, shape the opportunities people face in both market and non-market environments. Ultimately, this book challenges the actuarial logic and instrumental rationalism that drives public policy and emphasizes the role that the mass media play in justifying its expanded use. Although its arguments and examples take as their primary emphasis the ways in which these decision systems affect the life chances of African-Americans, the findings are also applicable to a broad range of groups burdened by discrimination.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315572758

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gandy, O. H.
Corresponding author
Gandy, Oscar H.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2016-05-23
OpenAlex
W4241465173
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
chance, public policy, mass media, discrimination, African Americans, life chances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.