The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices
Abstract
Harambee (pulling together) is a self-help movement indigenous to Kenya. Harambee has been an integral element of Kenyan nationalism. Before independence harambee was a grass-root form of social exchange of labour and other forms of mutual assistance. The concept became a national slogan, a motto on the nation crest and a rally cry on Madaraka Day in June 1963 when the President of Kenya, Mzee Jomo Kenyatta, formally made it such. Different interpretations of the nature and scope of the harambee movement have been forwarded by the relatively few scholars who have conducted research on this topic. Harambee has been said to predispose people and politicians to corruption in two ways. Following the adoption of multiparty politics, harambee had become a vehicle for bribing voters. If the current trend continues, bribery and patronage will become the primary function of public harambees and the community objectives will disappear altogether.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators
Oman, C. P., & Arndt, C. (2006) · Development Centre Studies · doi:10.1787/9789264026865-en · Cited by 507
Degrees of integrity: the threat of corruption in higher education
Chapman, D. W., & Lindner, S. (2016) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.927854 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Venue
- Measuring Corruption
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-05-06
- Pages
- 117-146
- OpenAlex
- W116915540
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.59
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315594385-13
- The paper
- Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices. (2016). Measuring Corruption. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315594385-13
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.