Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 161

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices

·2016·Measuring Corruption

Abstract

Harambee (pulling together) is a self-help movement indigenous to Kenya. Harambee has been an integral element of Kenyan nationalism. Before independence harambee was a grass-root form of social exchange of labour and other forms of mutual assistance. The concept became a national slogan, a motto on the nation crest and a rally cry on Madaraka Day in June 1963 when the President of Kenya, Mzee Jomo Kenyatta, formally made it such. Different interpretations of the nature and scope of the harambee movement have been forwarded by the relatively few scholars who have conducted research on this topic. Harambee has been said to predispose people and politicians to corruption in two ways. Following the adoption of multiparty politics, harambee had become a vehicle for bribing voters. If the current trend continues, bribery and patronage will become the primary function of public harambees and the community objectives will disappear altogether.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315594385-13

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 161

Metadata

Venue
Measuring Corruption
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2016-05-06
Pages
117-146
OpenAlex
W116915540
Cited by
161
References
0
FWCI
53.59
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315594385-13
The paper
Measuring the Immeasurable: Boundaries and Functions of (Macro) Corruption Indices. (2016). Measuring Corruption. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315594385-13

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.