The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Men’s Thoughts about Themselves and Other Men
Abstract
This chapter examines the responses from both the dating men and the pickup artists on the subject of men, and notes any differences between the two groups. It argues in many ways, the men's heterosexuality is performed to help create their homosociality and if the heterosexual desire overrides the homosocial desire it can threaten the status of homosocial connections. Hegemonic masculinity theory (HMT) posits male camaraderie as key to the social organisation of men, often to the detriment of heterosocial relationships. Unlike within the men's rights activists (MRA) and the rest of the men's rights online space known as the manosphere, the potential for confusion between homosociality and homosexuality was acknowledged to a degree within pickup artists (PUA). As physical attraction often plays an important part of dating interactions between many men and women. Sexual harassment usually focuses on male-on-female abuse.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Almanssori, S., Paskaran, L., & Mendes, K. (2026) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2025.2531789 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Arrowsmith, A.
- Corresponding author
- Anna Arrowsmith
- Venue
- Rethinking Misogyny
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2016-03-03
- Pages
- 33-68
- OpenAlex
- W4231476540
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
- Keywords
- men's rights movement, manosphere, homosociality, hegemonic masculinity, heterosexuality, masculinity, sexual harassment, dating, online communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review