The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evolving Curricular Designs through Teacher Adaptation and Implementation with Students over Time
Abstract
This chapter describes five years of an ongoing curricular design and enactment effort involving multiple stakeholders with diverse roles. It focuses primarily on particular individuals with roles of high school classroom teachers, and their interactions with university-based faculty and doctoral students involved in research and development. The chapter describes how particular teachers in diverse learning environments adapted a curricular model for involving adolescents in the authoring of science news stories and infographics for authentic publication. In the first summer institute, the emphasis was on helping participants understand science journalism. Processes of participatory design resulted in the project moving toward more multimodal communication. The project&s;s most engaged teachers were motivated by personal goals to find new instructional approaches that could increase the personal relevance of science topics and scientific inquiry for their students. The chapter concludes by discussing future directions for organizing distributed socio-technical systems for participatory design involving teachers and their students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some studies point to that direction, such as Polman et al. (2017), examining teachers and researchers working together to develop children's science literacy.”
From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Polman et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bødker, S. (1996). Creating conditions for participation: Conflicts and resources in systems development. Human-Computer Interaction, 11(3), 215–236. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N., Kuure, L., & Molin-Juustila, T. (2023) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-023-09473-8 · Cited by 6
“Some studies point to that direction, such as Polman et al. (2017), examining teachers and researchers working together to develop children’s science literacy.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Polman, J. L., Kohnen, A. M., Whitacre, M. P., Davidson, R. M., & Gebre, E. H.
- Venue
- Participatory Design for Learning
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-05-25
- Pages
- 59-70
- OpenAlex
- W2904066742
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
- Keywords
- curricular design, teacher adaptation, participatory design, science journalism, infographics, multimodal communication, teacher-student collaboration, high school science education, scientific inquiry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolving Curricular Designs through Teacher Adaptation and Implementation with Students over Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315630830-8
- The paper
- Polman, J. L., Kohnen, A. M., Whitacre, M. P., Davidson, R. M., & Gebre, E. H. (2017). Evolving Curricular Designs through Teacher Adaptation and Implementation with Students over Time. Participatory Design for Learning. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315630830-8