The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
NAGPRA, CUI and institutional will
Abstract
This chapter discusses one of the major issues in the US repatriation process: the practice of institutions categorizing ancestors as CUI, or "culturally unidentifiable", to resist repatriation to the rightful tribes. The CUI designation is used to impede repatriation of ancestors, as it can be arbitrarily applied and hides the politics of an institution resistant to Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). The chapter provides several case studies that demonstrate how institutional will has developed within many museums and universities, while others continue to practice retentive and more "internationalist" philosophies and resist repatriation of both human remains and funerary objects, clearly contrary to the human rights component intended within the spirit of NAGPRA. It also offers an analysis of the (all too common) rhetoric institutions and individuals use regarding their support of NAGPRA against the actual practices they engage in.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation . 1995. Mending the Circle: A Native American Repatriation Guide. New York: American Indian Ritual Object Repatriation Foundation. Available at: www.repatriationfoundation.org.
(n.d.)
Unresolved
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Geller, P. L. (2021) · Bioarchaeology and social theory · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70704-0_6 · Cited by 3
Lixinski, L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108769044.005
Andrews, A. B., & Barney, T. S. (2026) · Museum Anthropology · doi:10.1111/muan.70034
Metadata
- Authors
- Gould, D. R.
- Corresponding author
- Gould, D. Rae
- Venue
- The Routledge Companion to Cultural Property
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-07-31
- Pages
- 134-151
- OpenAlex
- W2903680849
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural Identity and Heritage
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Keywords
- NAGPRA, repatriation, human remains, grave goods, Native American tribes, museum policy, institutional resistance, human rights, internationalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
