Cited by 162Religion, Gender, and EnlightenmentSeventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical ThoughtGender Politics and Representation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mary Wollstonecraft and Feminist Republicanism: Independence, Rights and the Experience of Unfreedom

Halldenius, Lena·2015·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Mary Wollstonecraft is a writer whose work continues to provoke scholarly debate. Halldenius explores Wollstonecraft’s political philosophy, focusing on her treatment of republicanism and independence, to propose a new way of reading her work – that of a ‘feminist republican’.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315653792

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Halldenius, L.
Corresponding author
Halldenius, Lena
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2015-10-06
OpenAlex
W4239089635
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
18.83
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Politics and Representation
Keywords
Mary Wollstonecraft, republicanism, political independence, women's political thought, political philosophy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review