Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Abundance Index

Galle, Jillian E.·2017·Material Worlds

Abstract

The reasons for historical archaeology's current low-level of engagement with actual artifact data when dealing with questions of consumption are complex and interwoven. Explaining variation in the archaeological record is a difficult task that requires attention to a host of variables, including occupation span and intensity, the social and economic contexts faced by the site's occupants, their cultural backgrounds, as well as excavation methods, and post-depositional processes. This chapter offers a novel method to measure artifact class abundance that helps overcome some of these difficulties. It uses that method to explore patterns of change and synchronic variation in the acquisition, use, and discard of refined ceramics that flooded Atlantic societies in the 18th century. The chapter presents an overview of the consumer revolution, its participants, and how their demand for novel goods shaped ceramic production.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315657189-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Armstrong, Douglas . 1990 The Old Village and the Great House: An Archaeological and Historical Examination of Drax Hall Plantation, St. Ann’s Bay, Jamaica. University of Illinois Press, Champaign.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Galle, J. E.
Venue
Material Worlds
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-02-17
Pages
162-191
Cited by
5
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.