The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Teacher education in content-based language education
Abstract
This chapter focuses on key issues relevant to the preparation and continuing professional development of teachers who teach academic content through English as a second or foreign language. This covers such approaches as immersion, English-medium instruction (EMI), and content and language integrated learning (CLIL). The umbrella term ‘Content-based language education’ (CBLE) is used to refer to all such approaches. The chapter reviews three key issues which affect all teacher education in contexts where the teaching, learning and use of the English language and academic content are combined. These issues are: the need for effective initial and in-service teacher education provision; the need for greater understanding of teachers’ training and professional development needs; the need for further research into teacher education programmes and their processes and outcomes. On a more theoretical level, the chapter also addresses the nature of teachers’ knowledge for this type of teaching: either of language or content knowledge taken separately, or of their integration. It also focuses on content and language integration as a question of identity, particularly the struggle for teachers to see themselves as responsible for both types of learning. In order to illustrate how some of these key issues play out in teachers’ reflections and classroom interaction, illustrative examples of data drawn from a research project on CBLE teachers’ knowledge and practices are presented and ana…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Drawing on Morton's (2019) view of teacher-made CLIL materials, the teachers transitioned from being CLIL materials consumers to identifying themselves as CLIL materials producers.”
From Can engaging L2 teachers as material designers contribute to their professional development? findings from Colombia (2020) · cites this paper as Morton's (2019)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ball, P. , Kelly, K. and Clegg, J. (2015) Putting CLIL into Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. This is a very useful tool for CLIL teacher educators as it provides much-needed practical advice and frameworks for the integration of content and language. It covers such important topics as lesson and unit planning, materials design, and assessment. It also stands out for its inclusion of a chapter specifically dedicated to teacher education in CLIL.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Banegas, D. L., Corrales, K., & Poole, P. (2020) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102265 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Morton, T.
- Corresponding author
- Morton, Tom
- ORCID
- Morton, Tom
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of English Language Teacher Education
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-07-03
- Pages
- 169-183
- OpenAlex
- W2962648333
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 47.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Keywords
- teacher professional development, English-medium instruction, CLIL, immersion, in-service teacher professional development, teacher knowledge, teacher identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review