Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Privatization of Public Interest: Theorizing NGO Discourse in a Neoliberal Era

·2017·Social Movements

Abstract

If the twentieth century represented a ‘top-down’ approach to social and economic growth, then with the dawn of a new century we have entered a new era of ‘bottom up’ growth and social improvement. In this new model, national and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are the primary catalysts of change rather than experts from large bureaucratic institutions (including the state). NGOs have been identified as the preeminent, if not sole, organizational forms that can implement the global commitment to ‘bottom up’ development. Indeed, the discourse of ‘bottom up’ development cannot be dismissed as a rhetorical and superficial gesture on the part of states and international donor agencies. It has truly established itself within the policy process and plans of all official agencies of development that accord a significant and often direc tive role to NGOs in development projects and programmes (Chambers 1997; Clark 1991; Gardner and Lewis 1996).1

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315662084-17

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Venue
Social Movements
Published
2017-09-19
Pages
271-296
OpenAlex
W4246822881
Cited by
277
References
0
FWCI
233.81
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Privatization of Public Interest: Theorizing NGO Discourse in a Neoliberal Era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315662084-17
The paper
The Privatization of Public Interest: Theorizing NGO Discourse in a Neoliberal Era. (2017). Social Movements. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315662084-17

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.