The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ethnographic interview
Abstract
This chapter describes the use of interviews as a method for data collection in linguistic ethnography. It provides an account of the history of interviews, locating their origin as a tool in sociology and survey research, while qualitative and ethnographic interviews were developed particularly in anthropology and in Chicago School sociology. The chapter argues that the interpretive turn in the 1980s and 1990s led to expansion in the use of qualitative interviews in social sciences in general. It goes on to describe some of the debates around the use of interviews in linguistics and anthropology, including challenges around the role of the interviewer, the relationship between interviewer and informants, and the legitimacy of interview as a tool for understanding human behaviour. These debates are located in relation to broader historical developments of research paradigms, away from predominantly positivist frameworks. Recent ethnographic work in sociocultural linguistics which has drawn in part on interview data is described. The chapter underlines the importance of interviews as a form of triangulation in ethnographic research, while at the same time emphasising their co-constructed nature and highlighting the importance of interviewer reflexivity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using narrative in social research: qualitative and quantitative approaches
Elliott, J. (2005) · Cited by 1,224
Cited by
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y · Cited by 12,038
Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling
Etikan, I. (2016) · American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics · doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 · Cited by 11,412
Toward a Theory of Culturally Relevant Pedagogy
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312032003465 · Cited by 8,057
Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries
Guba, E. G. (1981) · ECTJ · doi:10.1007/bf02766777 · Cited by 5,527
Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.20786060 · Cited by 1,973
Metadata
- Authors
- Fina, A. D.
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-08-30
- Pages
- 154-167
- OpenAlex
- W2978845797
- Cited by
- 2,119
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 831.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ethnographic interview. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315675824-12
- The paper
- Fina, A. D. (2019). The ethnographic interview. The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315675824-12
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.