The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insurgent Practices and Decolonization of Future(s)
Abstract
This chapter elaborates the concept of insurgent planning (IP) and why it needs to be taken seriously in planning education, scholarship, and practice. It describes the crises and social contradictions of the late 20th and early 21st centuries and the implications of the resulting political and ideological shifts for planning. The chapter discusses the political philosophies that drive liberal democratic and insurgent citizenship practices and argues that IP ontologically departs from liberal traditions of so-called inclusive planning that have held the inclusion of disadvantaged groups as an objective of professional intervention. It discusses the potential flexibility of these forms of action and dispels a binary misconception of invited versus invented spaces for citizens&s; direct action. The chapter focuses on the theoretical construct of IP as practices that are transgressive, counter-hegemonic, and imaginative. It inspires by anticolonial scholars and activists of liberation and discusses the urgency in decolonizing the future as a realm of political contestation and imagination.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Ethnographic fieldwork allows scholars to grasp the multi-temporality of urban planning as residents' temporal frames differ from those of planners and their projects (Abram and Weszkalnys 2013;Miraftab 2017).”
From Design for Climate Change in the Neoliberal Present: Gentrification, Ecocide, and the Loss of Urbanity in New York City (2022) · cites this paper as Miraftab 2017
Citations
Cites
New York for Sale: Community Planning Confronts Global Real Estate
Marcuse, P., & Angotti, T. (2008) · Cited by 136
New York for sale community planning confronts global real estate
Angotti, T. (2008) · Cited by 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shifting Approaches to Planning Theory: Global North and South
Watson, V. (2016) · Urban Planning · doi:10.17645/up.v1i4.727 · Cited by 162
Planning, temporary urbanism and citizen-led alternative-substitute place-making in the Global South
Andres, L., Bakare, H., Bryson, J. R., Khaemba, W., Melgaço, L., & Mwaniki, G. (2019) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1665645 · Cited by 71
Seeing the insurgent in transformative planning practices
Huq, E. (2020) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/1473095219901290 · Cited by 64
Vasudevan, R., & Magdalena Novoa, E. (2021) · Planning Theory · doi:10.1177/14730952211000384 · Cited by 56
Ideological traces in Ghana's urban plans: How do traces get worked out in the Agbogbloshie, Accra?
Oteng‐Ababio, M., & Grant, R. J. (2018) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.10.007 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Miraftab, F.
- Corresponding author
- Miraftab, Faranak
- Venue
- The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-08-23
- Pages
- 276-288
- OpenAlex
- W2783932060
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 19.37
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban Planning and Governance
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Latin American Cultural Politics
- Keywords
- insurgent planning, decolonization, insurgent citizenship, liberal democracy, inclusive planning, counter-hegemonic practices, political imagination, direct action, planning education, anti-colonialism, liberation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review