Cognition and Metacognition within Self-Regulated Learning
Abstract
This chapter describes the complex fusion of cognition, metacognition and motivation that is self-regulated learning (SRL) and identifies key foci for future research and practice. Following a selective recap of cognition and metacognition, SRL is characterized using two perspectives: Philip H. Winne and Allyson Hadwin&s;s loosely sequenced, recursive four-phase model and Winne&s;s COPES model that identifies facets of a task wherein learners exercise SRL. Key challenges learners face are developing study tactics and learning strategies that SRL manages, and articulating the role of motivation in SRL. With these topics as backdrop, the chapter highlights three goals for future research: using data from multiple channels, tracing motivation as a dynamic variable over the timeline of a task and the critical need to better trace metacognitive monitoring and control. A strong recommendation is offered for reconceptualizing practice in ways that support learners as learning scientists who experiment with "what works" as they self-regulate learning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Metacognitive feedback prompts learners to reflect, track progress, and develop self-regulated learning skills.
“metacognitive feedback which prompts learners to reflect, track their progress, and develop self-regulated learning (SRL) skills.”
From Directive, metacognitive, or a blend of both? A comparison of AI-generated feedback types on student engagement, confidence, and outcomes (2026) · cites this paper as Winne, 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 1 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- Winne, P. H.
- Affiliations
- Simon Fraser University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Winne, Philip H.
- ORCID
- Winne, Philip H.
- Venue
- Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-09-07
- Pages
- 36-48
- OpenAlex
- W2771448768
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 52.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- student self-regulation, metacognition, cognition, motivation, learning strategies, metacognitive monitoring, metacognitive regulation, multi-source data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review