Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 8,634

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The theory of communicative action

Open access
·2014·The Philosophy of Habermas

Abstract

The Theory of Communicative Action tends to presuppose much of his work on the reconstruction of historical materialism, and in particular the understanding of evolution as a process by which societies respond to crises through the institutionalization of learning potentials. In cognitive utterances one asserts the propositional content, while in non-cognitive utterances one merely mentions it. Habermas&s;s early presentation of systematically distorted communication draws heavily upon the account of psychoanalysis given in Knowledge and Human Interests. The illocutionary force of speech acts has, for Habermas, a rational foundation. In suggesting that illocutionary force has a rationality, Habermas is responding to the problem posed by Wittgenstein&s;s game analogy. Discourse is characterized as that form of argument that is pursued once the assertive force of the propositional content has been suspended. The lifeworld is thus a source of solidarity, and as such cultural values cannot be questioned as a totality.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315710495-5

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 8,634

Metadata

Venue
The Philosophy of Habermas
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-12-18
Pages
138-187
OpenAlex
W1522588346
Cited by
8,634
References
0
FWCI
3238.97
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The theory of communicative action. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315710495-5
The paper
The theory of communicative action. (2014). The Philosophy of Habermas. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315710495-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.