The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wang Yang-ming's ethics of war
Abstract
Mozi was an early critic of the tradition of thought associated with Confucius, and founder of a religious and social activist community. The main source for Mohism the thinking associated with Mozi and his followers, the Mohists is the eponymous Mozi. Modern critics believe that the received corpus was probably written over an extended period of time throughout the Mohist community's existence, possibly taking final shape only in the early imperial age well after the demise of the community. The Mohists' main intellectual attention was focused on offering arguments against military aggression, and relatedly, on the distinction between unjustified military aggression and justified punitive interventions. Mohist doctrine has a broadly consequentialist structure specific ways of conduct or policies are moral if, when put into practice, they promote the world's welfare, and immoral if they harm the world. This chapter concludes with some brief remarks regarding the nature of the Mohist writings on war.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Loy 2015, 244 emphasizes, the Mohists' rhetorical aim of persuading rulers to eliminate military conflict tends to lead them away from detailed discussion of jus in bello.”
From The Mozi and Just War Theory in Pre-Han Thought (2016) · cites this paper as Loy 2015, 244
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Ahern, Dennis . 1976. “Is Mo Tzu a Utilitarian?” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 3(2), pp. 185–193.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Mozi and Just War Theory in Pre-Han Thought
Fraser, C. (2016) · Journal of Chinese Military History · doi:10.1163/22127453-12341300 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Twiss, S. B., & Chan, J. K. L.
- Venue
- Chinese Just War Ethics
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-05-15
- Pages
- 153-178
- OpenAlex
- W2904542696
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.14
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- HKBU Institutional Repository (Hong Kong Baptist University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › War, Ethics, and Justification
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- Wang Yangming, ethics of war, Mohism, Mozi, military aggression, just war theory, consequentialism, Confucianism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review